free hosting   image hosting   hosting reseller   online album   e-shop   famous people 
Free Website Templates
Free Installer

Nicholeto Chordiman Directory 16
Page 09

A good combination for Nicholeto Chordiman includes all ingredients.

Nicholeto Chordiman

Nicholeto Chordiman Home

Nicholeto Chordiman Sitemap

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 01

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 02

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 03

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 04

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 05

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 06

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 07

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 08

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 09

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 10

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 11

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 12

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 13

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 14

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 15

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 16

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 17

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 18

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 19

Nicholeto Chordiman Dir 20

Nicholeto Chordiman Directory 16
Page 09

"It is almost impossible to convey in words an idea of the quickness and graceful address of her movements: they may indeed be termed aerial, as she seems merely to touch in her progress the branches among which she exhibits her evolutions. In these feats her hands and arms are the sole organs of locomotion, her body, hanging as if suspended by a rope, sustained by one hand (the right, for example), she launches herself, by an energetic movement, to a distant branch, which she catches with the left hand; but her hold is less than momentary; the impulse for the next launch is acquired; the branch then aimed at is attained by the right hand again, and quitted instantaneously, and so on, in alternate succession. In this manner spaces of twelve and eighteen feet are cleared, with the greatest ease and uninterruptedly, for hours together, without the slightest appearance of fatigue being manifested; and it is evident that, if more space could be allowed, distances very greatly exceeding eighteen feet would be as easily cleared; so that Duvaucel's assertion that he has seen these animals launch themselves from one branch to another, forty feet asunder, startling as it is, may be well credited. Sometimes, on seizing a branch in her progress, she will throw herself, by the power of one arm only, completely round it, making a revolution with such rapidity as almost to deceive the eye, and continue her progress with undiminished velocity. It is singular to observe how suddenly this Gibbon can stop, when the impetus giving by the rapidity and distance of her swinging leaps would seem to require a gradual abatement of her movements. In the very midst of her flight a branch is seized, the body raised, and she is seen, as if by magic, quietly seated on it, grasping it with her feet. As suddenly she again throws herself into action.

Such being well-established facts respecting the Asiatic anthropoids, analogy alone might justify us in expecting the African species to offer similar peculiarities, separately or combined; or, at any rate, would destroy the force of any attempted _a priori_ argument against such direct testimony as might be adduced in favor of their existence. And if the organization of any of the African apes could be demonstrated to fit it better than either of its Asiatic allies for the erect position and for efficient attack, there would be still less reason for doubting its occasional adoption of the upright attitude, or of aggressive proceedings.

The internal evidence of the wooden figures themselves--nothing analogous to which, it should be remembered, can be found in the chapel of 1687--points to a much earlier date. I have met with no school of sculpture belonging to the early part of the eighteenth century to which they can be plausibly assigned; and the supposition that they are the work of some unknown local genius who was not led up to and left no successors may be dismissed, for the work is too scholarly to have come from any one but a trained sculptor. I refer of course to those figures which the artist must be supposed to have executed with his own hand, as, for example, the central figure of the Crucifixion group and those of the Magdalene and St. John. The greater number of the figures were probably, as was suggested to me by Mr. Ranshaw, of Lowth, executed by a local woodcarver from models in clay and wax furnished by the artist himself. Those who examine the play of line in the hair, mantle, and sleeve of the Magdalene in the Crucifixion group, and contrast it with the greater part of the remaining draperies, will find little hesitation in concluding that this was the case, and will ere long readily distinguish the two hands from which the figures have mainly come. I say "mainly," because there is at least one other sculptor who may well have belonged to the year 1709, but who fortunately has left us little. Examples of his work may perhaps be seen in the nearest villain with a big hat in the Flagellation chapel, and in two cherubs in the Assumption of the Virgin.


[ Sec 16 Page 09 ] [ Sec 16 Page 02 ] [ Sec 16 Page 03 ] [ Sec 16 Page 04 ] [ Sec 16 Page 05 ]
[ Sec 16 Page 06 ] [ Sec 16 Page 07 ] [ Sec 16 Page 08 ] [ Sec 16 Page 09 ] [ Sec 16 Page 10 ]


This page is Copyright © Nicholeto Chordiman and all rights are reserved. Please don't copy without proper authorization. References to other Web sites are not endorsements. Nicholeto Chordiman provides no assurances about the quality or content of other sites to which Nicholeto points links, as these links may or may not be provided only for reference. Linking does not in any way confer approval or responsibility for content placed on other Web sites.